Why is culture important in communication
In , Studies indicate 9 in 10 U. Furthermore, 1 in 4 American employers have lost or been unable to pursue a business opportunity due to their inability to speak a language other than English. The language in highest demand among employees are Spanish, Chinese, and English.
There are numerous potential stumbling blocks to cross-cultural communication. Some of these directly involve forms of communication, such as nonverbal communication and differing interpretations of words and concepts across cultures that speak the same language.
Other challenges involve certain business practices, such as cultural interpretations of common concepts like initial meetings, approaches to collaborations, and ways of gaining knowledge. There can also be cultural differences in attitudes toward conflict, decision-making, and disclosure. Cultural intelligence CQ is the ability to communicate with others and work effectively in multicultural environments.
One of the foundational elements of cultural intelligence is CQ drive, which is a desire or motivation to acquire knowledge about a new culture. A third building block, CQ action, is defined as an ability to act appropriately in culturally diverse environments. Notice the emphasis on repeated there: it is not in single instances of communication that culture is made, but rather in the repeated exchange of information and the reinforcement of the ideals and values it embodies, all conveyed within a particular moment.
One way we can think about this complex interplay is by looking at du Gay, et al notion of the circuit of culture. The circuit of culture is a way of exploring a product of a culture as a complex object that is affected by and has an impact on a number of different aspects of that culture. Representation — how is the meaning conveyed to the audience, user, or co-communicator? For example, what does the colour pink represent in your cultural context?
Identity — refers to how meaning is internalized by the receiver or audience. Our identity is shaped by our culture, which creates a range of viable and non-viable identity options that are presented, refined and renegotiated through our communication and exchange of cultural objects.
By consuming and displaying certain communicative texts and strategies, we are both claiming certain identity positions, and simultaneously rejecting others. Production — here refers to the production of meaning. Meaning can be produced and reproduced in a number of ways. An individual may produce meaning about themselves in the way they dress or wear their hat. Regardless of the station of life, the sector of work, or complexity of establishment, communication is used.
Communication is necessary for life to function. Not only that, but it is especially necessary for life to function well. With this in. To distinguish the way in which different leadership style will affect Cisco systems — group communication. By doing a thorough analysis of the interactions I saw many of the themes we discussed in class such as form versus meaning, gender, power in relationships, culture, and speech patterns.
Each of these factors played a role in how the conversation played out. The most prevalent, however, was power and its relationship or lack thereof to.
Understanding how a culture communicates will, not only, allow people to convey a message to one another the way it was intended, but it will also help individuals to find identity in the differences and commonalities of the numerous cultures. The miscommunication or ignorance of a cultural group can cause segregation, division and, even war. In looking at culture and communication , undoubtedly, the written and spoken language is one of the most obvious distinctions.
All the …show more content… In a test to see how people of different language groups treated time and space, individuals were shown pictures of progressing motions like a banana being eaten and a man growing old, and they were left to put them in order. This will not be the case in this section. We are very interested in methodological pieces.
We are also interested in theoretically driven pieces. We recognize that the study of culture and communication can be approached from many different angles. We live in a world that can no longer only publish for fellow academics. As I write this introduction, the world is in the midst of the Covid pandemic, and the US is in the midst of the Black Lives Matter movement.
We as researchers have a responsibility to not only produce sound theoretical and methodological research, but also research that makes a difference. This section will also strive to publish timely research. One thing that has impressed me about Frontiers is its review to publication process. Most manuscripts are decided on within 3—4 weeks and if accepted the manuscript is up for anyone to read within 2 months of being submitted.
By the time a manuscript finishes the review process and is accepted the timeframe can be 4—6 months, if you're lucky. However, only subscribers to the journals individual or institutional can read the work after those 6 or more months. Typically, many people around the world who do not have access to the journal cannot read your results for 18—24 months after the piece is submitted. How timely is the data then?
I am proud to be working with an open-access publisher that facilitates open access to information, which allows all people to receive access to key findings in a timely manner. The sixth and final indicator is that of respect for open science. While there have been extensive debates about open science in other social sciences, communication as a discipline has not engaged in these debates as extensively Bowman and Keene, In this section we encourage all submitters to make their data available when requested by others.
It is critical we foster an atmosphere of openness and access to information.
0コメント